|
|||
|
|||
|
|
องค์การรัฐวิสาหกิจไทยกับความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างการจัดการความรู้และนวัตกรรม |
|
|
Thai State Enterprise
Organizations in the Aspect of the Relationship Between Knowledge Management and
Innovation |
||
|
|
||
วันที่ได้รับต้นฉบับบทความ : วันที่แก้ไขปรับปรุงบทความ : วันที่ตอบรับตีพิมพ์บทความ : |
ปวีณา เข็มจัด หัวหน้างาน 8
ฝ่ายบริหารทรัพยากรบุคคล การประปาส่วนภูมิภาค
สำนักงานใหญ่ ดร.ทิพย์รัตน์
เลาหวิเชียร รองศาสตราจารย์ประจำภาควิชาการจัดการเทคโนโลยีและการปฏิบัติการ คณะบริหารธุรกิจ
มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์ (ผู้ประสานงานหลัก) |
||
|
|
||
Received: Revised: Accepted: |
Paweena Khamchat Supervisor 8, Human
Resources Management Department, Provincial Waterwork Authority Dr.Tipparat Laohavichien Associate Professor of
the Department of Technology and Operations Management, Faculty of Business
Administration, Kasetsart University (Corresponding Author) |
||
|
|
||
คำสำคัญ : การจัดการความรู้ นวัตกรรม |
บทคัดย่อ งานวิจัยนี้มีวัตถุประสงค์
เพื่อศึกษาความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างการจัดการความรู้และนวัตกรรมขององค์การรัฐวิสาหกิจไทย
โดยมีประเภทองค์การรัฐวิสาหกิจไทยเป็นตัวแปรกำกับ การเก็บข้อมูลใช้แบบสอบถามออนไลน์จากพนักงานที่ปฏิบัติงานเกี่ยวข้องกับการจัดการความรู้และนวัตกรรมขององค์การรัฐวิสาหกิจไทยที่ได้รับรางวัลรัฐวิสาหกิจดีเด่นด้านความคิดสร้างสรรค์
และนวัตกรรมในปี พ.ศ. 2564 - 2565 จำนวน 12 องค์การ
จำนวนแบบสอบถามที่สมบูรณ์ที่ได้นำมาประมวลผลมีทั้งสิ้น 279 ชุด
และใช้การวิเคราะห์ข้อมูล เพื่อทดสอบสมมติฐานด้วยสถิติการถดถอยเชิงเส้นตรง (Linear Regression Analysis) และการวิเคราะห์อิทธิพลกำกับของประเภทองค์การรัฐวิสาหกิจไทย
ผ่านการวิเคราะห์สัมประสิทธิ์ของตัวแปรปฏิสัมพันธ์ด้วยโปรแกรมสำเร็จรูป PROCESS
Macro ซึ่งผลการวิจัยพบว่า 1)
การจัดการความรู้มีอิทธิพลเชิงบวกต่อนวัตกรรมขององค์การ 2)
ประเภทขององค์การรัฐวิสาหกิจไทยมีอิทธิพลกำกับความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างการจัดการความรู้และนวัตกรรมขององค์การ
โดยที่ระดับการจัดการความรู้ต่ำมีความแตกต่างของความสามารถในการสร้างนวัตกรรมขององค์การรัฐวิสาหกิจไทยที่ต่างประเภทกันสูงกว่าที่ระดับการจัดการความรู้ที่สูง
และพบว่า องค์การรัฐวิสาหกิจไทยประเภทสาขาสาธารณูปการ
มีความสามารถสร้างนวัตกรรมขององค์การได้ต่ำกว่าองค์การรัฐวิสาหกิจไทยประเภทสาขาอื่น
ๆ โดยผลการวิจัยครั้งนี้ เป็นประโยชน์ต่อองค์การทั้งในภาคเอกชนและรัฐวิสาหกิจไทย
เพื่อใช้เป็นแนวทางในการกำหนดสมรรถนะหลักหรือความสามารถหลักขององค์การด้านการจัดการความรู้และนวัตกรรมให้สูงขึ้น |
||
|
|
||
Keywords: |
ABSTRACT This research examines
the relationship between knowledge management and innovation within Thai
state enterprise organizations. The moderator of this study is the type of
Thai state enterprise organizations. Data collection utilizes an online
questionnaire that is responded to by employees involved in knowledge
management and innovation activities within Thai state enterprise
organizations that received awards for excellence in creativity and
innovation in the years 2021-2022, totaling 12 organizations. A total of 279
complete questionnaires were analyzed. The research hypotheses were tested
using linear regression analysis, and the moderation effect was analyzed
using the PROCESS Macro. The research findings indicate that 1) Knowledge
management positively influences organizational innovation, and 2) The type
of Thai state enterprise organization moderates the relationship between
knowledge management and innovation, with lower knowledge management ability
resulting in greater innovation capability among different types of Thai
state enterprise organizations. Additionally, it was found that Thai state
enterprise organizations in the public utilities sector have a lower ability
to innovate than organizations in the other sectors, respectively. These
findings benefit both private and Thai state enterprise organizations in
guiding strategies to enhance knowledge management and innovation
competitiveness. |
||
|
|
||
|
REFERENCES Acevedo, J., & Diaz-Molina, I. (2023).
Learning organizations in emerging economies: the effect of knowledge
management on innovative culture in Chilean companies. The Learning
Organization, 30(1), 37-54. DOI: 10.1108/TLO-01-2021-0009 Achmad, F., Prambudia, Y., & Rumanti, A. A. (2023). Improving tourism industry
performance through support system facilities and stakeholders: The role of
environmental dynamism. Sustainability, 15(5), 4103. DOI:
10.3390/su15054103 Ahmad, A. O., Fam, S. F., Chuan,
Z. L., Wahjono, S. I., Nusa, N. M., & Husseini,
S. A. (2022). Integration of TQM practices and ERP to enhance innovation
culture and innovative work behavior: A proposed framework. Journal
of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 4668-4676. Retrieved from
https://www.journalppw.com/ Al-Dhaafri, H.,
& Alosani, M. (2021). Integration of TQM and
ERP to enhance organizational performance and excellence: empirical evidence
from public sector using SEM. World Journal of Entrepreneurship,
Management and Sustainable Development, 17(4), 822-845. DOI: 10.1108/WJEMSD-12-2020-0170 Aujirapongpan, S.,
Vadhanasin, P.,
Chandrachai, A.,
& Coopara, P.
(2010). Innovation: meaning, types and importance
towards being an entrepreneur. Journal of Business Administration. 33(128), 49-65. Retrieved from http://www.jba.tbs.tu.ac.th/ Barney, J. B.
(1996). The resource-based theory of the firm. Organization Science, 7(5),
470-476. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.7.5.469 Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2001). The resource-based view of
the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal
of Management, 27(6), 625641. DOI:
10.1177/014920630102700601 Baruch, Y. (1999).
Response rates in academic studies-a comparative analysis. Human Relations.
421-434 Battisti, E., Miglietta, N., Nirino, N., & Diaz, M. V.
(2020). Value creation, innovation practice, and competitive advantage:
Evidence from the FTSE MIB index. European Journal of Innovation
Management, 23(2), 273-290. DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-09-2018-0211 Buallay, A., Kukreja, G., Aldhaen, E.,
Mubarak, M. A., & Hamdan, A. M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility
disclosure and firms' performance in Mediterranean countries: a stakeholders'
perspective. EuroMed Journal of
Business, 15(3), 361-375. DOI: 10.1108/EMJB-05-2019-0066 Carayannis, E. G.
(1999). Knowledge transfer through technological hyperlearning
in five industries. Technovation, 19(3),
141-161. Cepeda-Carrion,
I., Ortega-Gutierrez, J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Cegarra-Navarro,
J. G. (2023). The mediating role of knowledge creation
processes in the relationship between social media and open innovation.
Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14, 1275-1297. DOI:
10.1007/s13132-022-00949-4 Chesbrough,
H., & Spohrer, J. (2006). A
research manifesto for services science. Communication of the ACM, 49(7),
35-40. DOI: 10.1145/1139922.1139945 Cholawattana, C. (2022). The
relationship between quality management throughout the organization,
innovation, competitive advantage and organizational sustainability of
manufacturing companies in Thailand. (Doctoral Thesis). Kasetsart University, Faculty of
Business Administration. Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and
testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5). 693-716. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.42.5.693 Drucker,
P. F. (1994). Post-capitalist
society. New York: Harper Business. Fahey, L., & Prusak, L. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge
management. California Management Review, 40(3), 265-76. DOI: 10.2307/41165954 Freeman,
C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation (3rd ed.). UK: Routledge. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating
structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.
Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 3950. DOI: 10.2307/3151312 Garavelli, A., Gorgoglione, M., & Scozzi,
B. (2002). Managing knowledge transfer by knowledge technologies. Technovations, 22(5), 269-79. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00009-8 Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An
organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of management
information systems, 18(1), 185-214. DOI:
10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669 Gopalakrishnan, S., & Damanpour,
F. (1997). A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and
technology management. Omega, 25(1), 15-28. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00043-6 Grant,
R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic
Management Journal, 17, 109-22. DOI: 10.1002/SMj.4250171110 Grewatsch, S., &
Kleindienst, I. (2018). How organizational cognitive frames affect
organizational capabilities: The context of corporate sustainability. Long
Range Planning, 51(4), 607-624.
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.03.004 Hair, J. F.,
Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2014). Multivariate data analysis.
A global perspective. New York: Pearson Prentice Hall Inc. Hayaeian, S., Hesarzadeh, R., & Abbaszadeh, M. R. (2022). The impact of knowledge
management strategies on the relationship between intellectual capital and
innovation: evidence from SMEs. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(4),
765-798. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional
process analysis: a regression-based approach. New
York: Guilford Press. Ho, C.-T. (2009).
The relationship between knowledge management enablers and performance. Industrial
Management & Data Systems, 109(1), 98-117. DOI: 10.1108/02635570910926618
Hun Myoung Park. (2008).
Univariate Analysis and Normality Test Using SAS, Stata, and SPSS. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iuswrrest/api/core/bitstreams/828193ec-ac51-4a2b-ab0c-e27137b29ba3/content Hurley, R. F., & Hult,
G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning:
an integration and empirical examination. Journal of marketing, 62(3),
42-54. Hsu,
C.-C., Tan, K. C., Jayaram, J., & Laosirihongthong,
T. (2014). Corporate
entrepreneurship, operations core competency and innovation in emerging
economies. International Journal of Production Research, 52(18),
5467-5483. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2014.915069 Ju,
T. L., Li, C.-Y., & Lee, T.-S. (2006). A contingency model for knowledge
management capability and innovation. Industrial Management & Data
Systems, 106(6), 855-877. DOI: 10.1108/02635570610671524 Kalko, M. M., Erena, O. T., & Debele, S. A. (2023). Technology
management practices and innovation: Empirical evidence from medium-and
large-scale manufacturing firms in Ethiopia. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and
Development, 15(1), 107123. DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2022.2040828
Kline, R. B.
(2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford publications. Kongpichayanond, P.
(2013). Perceived Relationships among Knowledge
Management, Total Quality Management and Organization Innovation Performance.
(Doctoral Thesis). The University of Minnesota, Work and
Human Resource Education. Krungsri, (2022,
April). Industry Outlook 2021-2023: Power Generation. Retrieved from https://www.krungsri.com/en/research/industry/industry-outlook/energy-utilities/power-generation/io/io-power-generation-21 Krejcie, R. V.,
& Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research
activities. Educational and
Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607610 Kucharska, W., &
Erickson, G. S. (2023). Tacit knowledge acquisition & sharing, and its
influence on innovations: a polish/US cross-country study. International
Journal of Information Management, 71. DOI:
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102647 Le, T.-H., Park, D., & Castillejos-Petalcorin,
C. (2023). Performance comparison
of state-owned enterprises versus private firms in selected emerging Asian
countries. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 30(1),
26-48. DOI: 10.1108/JABES-08-2021-0116 Lee,
E.-S., & Song, D.-W. (2015). The effect of shipping
knowledge and absorptive capacity on organizational innovation and logistics
value. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(2), 218-237. DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-01-2013-0011 Liao,
C., Wang, H.-Y., Chuang, S.-H., Shih, M.-L., & Liu, C.-C. (2010).
Enhancing knowledge management for R&D innovation and firm performance:
An integrative view. African Journal of Business Management. 4(14),
3026-3038. Likert, R. (2017). The method of constructing an attitude scale. In
Fishbein, M. ed. Attitude theory and measurement. New York: John Wiley
and Sons. Madhavan, R.,
& Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New
product development as knowledge management. Journal of marketing, 62(4),
1-12. DOI: 10.1177/00222499806200401 McDermott, R., &
ODell, C. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to knowledge sharing. Journal
of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 76-85. DOI: 1108/13673270110384428 Mohamed,
E. E. (2023). Understanding the relationship between
knowledge management and pharmaceutical innovation empirical study. Basic
and Clinical Pharmacy Research, 2(1), 1-23. DOI:
10.58396/bcpr020102 Murat, A.
I., & Baki, B. (2011). Antecedents and
performance impacts of product versus process innovation: Empirical evidence
from SMEs located in Turkish science and technology parks. European
journal of innovation management, 14(2), 172-206. DOI:
10.1108/14601061111124885 Mytelka, L. K., & Smith, K. (2002). Policy learning and
innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process. Research
policy, 31(8-9), 1467-1479. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00076-8 Nonaka,
I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company. New
York: Oxford University Press. Nonaka, I., Von, K.,
& Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge
creation theory: evolutionary paths and future advances. Organizational
Studies, 27(8), 1179-1208. DOI: 10.1177/0170840606066312 Nunnally,
J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric
Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
Higher. Nursal, M. F., Rianto, M. R., &
Bukhari, E. (2022). The Influence of Market Orientation, Entrepreneurial
Orientation, Knowledge Management and Learning Organization on Performance
Mediated by Innovation in Culinary SMEs in Bekasi. East Asian
Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(8), 1691-1702. DOI: 10.55927/eajmr.v1i8.1266 OCDE. (2005). The organization for economic co-operation and
development annual report. Retrieved from
https://www.oecd.org/about/34711139.pdf Office
of Thailand Quality Award. (2019). Criteria for the national quality award
2020-2021. Bangkok: Eastern Printing Public Company Limited. Park, H., &
Choi, S. O. (2019). Digital innovation adoption and its
economic impact focused on path analysis at national level. Journal of
open innovation: Technology, market, and complexity, 5(3), 56. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc5030056 Pérez-Luño, A., Alegre, J., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2019). The
role of tacit knowledge in connecting knowledge exchange and combination with
innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(2), 186-198. Phongsichomphu, W.
(2015). Effects of state enterprises information
technology utilization on being a learning organization and an innovative
organization. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research: Graduate Studies, 4(3), 50. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3259729 Polas, M. R. H.,
& Raju, V. (2021). Technology and entrepreneurial marketing decisions
during COVID-19. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(2),
95-112. Porter,
M. E., and Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive
advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149160. Rehman, U. U., &
Iqbal, A. (2020). Nexus of knowledge-oriented
leadership, knowledge management, innovation and organizational performance
in higher education. Business Process Management Journal, 26(6), 1731-1758. DOI:
10.1108/BPMJ-07-2019-0274 Rossi, S. P. S., Bonanno, G., Giansoldati, M.,
& Gregori, T. (2021). Export
starters and exciters: Do innovation and finance matter?. Structural Change and
Economic Dynamics, 56, 280-297.
DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2020.11.004 Rovinelli, R. J., &
Hambleton, R. K. (1976). On the use of content specialists in the
assessment of criterion- referenced test item validity. Massachusetts:
The University of Massachusetts. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED121845 Scarbrough, H. (2003). Knowledge management, HRM and the innovation
process. International journal of manpower, 24(5),
501-516. Schumpeter,
J. A. (1991). The economics and
sociology of capitalism. New York: Princeton University Press. Scuotto, V.,
Alfiero, S.,
Cuomo, M. T., & Monge, F. (2023). Knowledge
management and technological innovation in family SMEs context.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(3), 789-798. DOI:
10.1108/JKM-04-2023-0281 State
Enterprise Policy. (2020). Results of evaluation of state enterprise
operations. State Enterprise Evaluation, 1-75. State
Enterprise Policy. (2023). Criteria for evaluating
the operational processes and management of Core Business Enablers of state
enterprises. Bangkok: n.p. Stojcic, N., Hashi, I., & Telhaj, S.
(2011). Innovation activities and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the
behavior of firms in the new EU member states and candidate countries. CASE
Network Studies and Analyses, 424. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1825882
Suntiprabhob, V.
(2014). Thai state enterprise
organization. Thai Publica, Retrieved from https://thaipublica.org/2014/11/veerathai-39/ Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S.
(2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Pearson Education. Teneiji, T. M. A., Ahamat, A., Murad, M. A., & Raheem, H. A. A. (2022). The mediating role of knowledge management in the
relationship between IT capabilities and innovation capabilities. Special Ugdymas/ Special Education, 1(43). 2734-2751.
Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/ Tian,
M., Deng, P., Zhang, Y., & Salmador, M. P. (2018). How does culture influence innovation? A systematic
literature review. Management Decision, 56(5),
1088-1107. DOI: 10.1108/MD-05-2017-0462 Tris
Corporation Limited. (2019). Report on the status of knowledge management
of Thai organizations. n.p.: Author. Vanichabancha, K. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn
University Press. Vanichabancha, K. (2019). An
analysis of SEM with AMOS (3rd Ed.) Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University
Press. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The
development and validation of the organisational
innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European
journal of innovation management, 7(4), 303-313. DOI: 10.1108/14601060410565056
Wickramasinghe, N., Fadlalla, A., & Sharma, S. (2004). The KM
infrastructure: making implicit knowledge assets explicit. proceeding of the
37th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. USA. Yeh, Y.-J., Lai,
S.-Q., & Ho, C.-T. (2006). Knowledge management
enablers: a case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(6),
793-810. DOI: 10.1108/02635570610671489 Zhang,
Z., Song, F., & Song, Z. (2020). Promoting knowledge sharing in the
workplace: Punishment v. reward. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 131,
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109518 |
||