|
|||
|
|||
|
|
¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ·ÕèÁռŵèÍ¡ÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ
: º·ºÒ·¢Í§µÑÇá»Ã¤Ñ蹡ÅÒ§ ¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡ÃÃкº¹ÔàÇÈʵÒÃì·ÍѾ㹻ÃÐà·Èä·Â |
|
|
Digital Marketing on
Innovation Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity in
Thailand’s Startup Ecosystem |
||
|
|
||
Çѹ·Õèä´éÃѺµé¹©ºÑºº·¤ÇÒÁ : Çѹ·Õèá¡é䢻ÃѺ»Ãاº·¤ÇÒÁ : Çѹ·ÕèµÍºÃѺµÕ¾ÔÁ¾ìº·¤ÇÒÁ : |
´Ã.¾§Éì¹ÃÔ¹·Ãì »Ô´¨ÑµØÃÑÊ ´Ã.©ÑµÃªÑ ÍÔ¹·Êѧ¢ì ¼ÙéªèÇÂÈÒʵÃÒ¨ÒÃÂì»ÃШÓÊÒ¢Ò¡ÒõÅÒ´ ¤³ÐºÃÔËÒøØÃ¡Ô¨
ÁËÒÇÔ·ÂÒÅÑÂà·¤â¹âÅÂÕÃÒªÁ§¤ÅÍÕÊÒ¹ ´Ã.¹ÔÃÁÒÅÂì §ÒÁàËÁÒÐ ÍÒ¨ÒÃÂì»ÃШÓÊÒ¢Ò¡ÒèѴ¡Òà ¤³Ðà·¤â¹âÅÂÕ¡ÒèѴ¡ÒÃ
ÁËÒÇÔ·ÂÒÅÑÂà·¤â¹âÅÂÕÃÒªÁ§¤ÅÍÕÊÒ¹ ÇÔ·ÂÒà¢µÊØÃÔ¹·Ãì (¼Ùé»ÃÐÊÒ¹§Ò¹ËÅÑ¡) |
||
|
|
||
Received: Revised: Accepted: |
Dr.Pongnarin Pitjatturat Dr.Chatchai Inthasang Assistant professor of
Marketing Program, Faculty Business
Administration, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Dr.Niramarn Ngammoh Lecturer of Management
Program, Faculty of Management
Technology, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Surin Campus (Corresponding Author) |
||
|
|
||
¤ÓÊÓ¤Ñ : ¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ ¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁè |
º·¤Ñ´ÂèÍ ¡ÒÃÇԨѹÕéÁÕÇѵ¶Ø»ÃÐʧ¤ì
à¾×è͵ÃǨÊͺ¤ÇÒÁÊÍ´¤Åéͧ¡ÅÁ¡Å×¹âÁà´ÅÊÁ¡ÒÃâ¤Ã§ÊÃéÒ§¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ·ÕèÁÕÍÔ·¸Ô¾ÅµèÍ¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁáÅСÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡ÃÃкº¹ÔàÇÈʵÒÃì·ÍѾ㹻ÃÐà·Èä·Â áÅÐà¾×èÍÈÖ¡ÉÒº·ºÒ·µÑÇá»Ã¤Ñ蹡ÅÒ§¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡ÃÃÐËÇèÒ§¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅáÅСÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡ÃÃкº¹ÔàÇÈʵÒÃì·ÍѾ㹻ÃÐà·Èä·Â â´Â»ÃЪҡÃ㹡ÒÃÇԨѤÃÑé§¹Õé¤×Í
ͧ¤ì¡ÃÃкº¹ÔàÇÈʵÒÃì·ÍѾ㹻ÃÐà·Èä·Â
ãªéẺÊͺ¶ÒÁà»ç¹à¤Ã×èͧÁ×Í㹡ÒÃà¡çºÃǺÃÇÁ¢éÍÁÙÅ ¨Ò¡¨Ó¹Ç¹»ÃЪҡ÷Ñé§ËÁ´ 488
ͧ¤ì¡Ã ä´é¨Ó¹Ç¹¡ÅØèÁµÑÇÍÂèÒ§¡ÅѺÁÒ 242 ͧ¤ì¡Ã
ÇÔà¤ÃÒÐËì¢éÍÁÙÅ´éÇÂâÁà´ÅÊÁ¡ÒÃâ¤Ã§ÊÃéÒ§ ¼Å¡ÒÃÇԨѾºÇèÒ
¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅÁÕÍÔ·¸Ô¾ÅàªÔ§ºÇ¡ÍÂèÒ§ÁÕ¹ÑÂÊӤѵèÍ¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡Ã
¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡ÃÁÕÍÔ·¸Ô¾ÅàªÔ§ºÇ¡ÍÂèÒ§ÁÕ¹ÑÂÊӤѵèÍ¡ÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ
áÅСÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁä´éÃѺÍÔ·¸Ô¾Å·Ò§ÍéÍÁã¹àªÔ§ºÇ¡¨Ò¡¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ
â´Â¼èÒ¹µÑÇá»Ã¤Ñ蹡ÅÒ§¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡Ã
â´Â¼Å¡ÒÃÇԨѤÃÑé§¹Õé ÊÒÁÒö¹Óä»ÊÙèͧ¤ì¤ÇÒÁÃÙéà¡ÕèÂǡѺ¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ
¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡Ã
áÅСÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ ¹Í¡¨Ò¡¹Õé
º·¤ÇÒÁ¹ÕéÂѧÁդس¤èÒÍÂèÒ§ÂÔè§ÊÓËÃѺ¹Ñ¡ÇÔ¨ÑÂáÅмÙéºÃÔËÒÃͧ¤ì¡Ã
ÃÇÁ¶Ö§Ë¹èǧҹ·Õèà¡ÕèÂÇ¢éͧ¡ÑºÍ§¤ì¡ÃÃкº¹ÔàÇÈʵÒÃì·ÍѾ㹻ÃÐà·Èä·Â
à¾×èÍãªéà»ç¹á¹Ç·Ò§ã¹¡ÒáÓ˹´¡ÅÂØ·¸ì´éÒ¹¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅáÅСÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ·ÕèÊÙ§¢Öé¹ |
||
|
|
||
Keywords: |
ABSTRACT This study aimed to
empirically examine the structural equation model of the influence of digital
marketing on organizational ambidexterity and innovation performance of
Thailand startup ecosystems. The
study investigated the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity in the
relationship between digital marketing and innovation. A survey was
administered to a sample of 242 Thai startup organizations, selected from a
population of 488. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze
the data. The findings revealed that digital marketing significantly and
positively influenced organizational ambidexterity. Organizational
ambidexterity was found to have a significant positive impact on innovation
performance. Furthermore, digital marketing indirectly influenced innovation
performance through the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. The
findings of this research contribute to knowledge on digital marketing,
organizational ambidexterity, and innovation performance. In addition, this
article offers significant value to researchers, organizational leaders, and
entities involved in the startup ecosystem in Thailand. It serves as a guide
for developing advanced strategies in digital marketing and innovation
performance. |
||
|
|
||
|
REFERENCES Aaker, J. L., Benet-Martinez, V., & Garolera,
J. (2001). Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese
and Spanish brand personality constucts. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 492-508. Abetti, P. A. (2000). Critical success factors for radical technological
innovation: A five case study. Creativity and Innovation Management, 9(4),
208-221. ABI, J., & Arief, M. T. S.
(2017). Examining the relationship between transformational leadership and
dynamic capability to the adoption of digital marketing in consumer shopping
good firms. International Journal of Economics & Management, 11(S2), 487-504. Al Nuaimi, F. M. S., Singh, S. K., & Ahmad, S. Z.
(2024). Open innovation in SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal
of Knowledge Management, 28(2), 484-504. Ali Abbasi, G., Abdul Rahim, N. F., Wu, H., Iranmanesh, M., & Keong, B.
N. C. (2022). Determinants of SME’s social media marketing adoption:
competitive industry as a moderator. Sage Open, 12(1),
1-19. Aminova, M., & Marchi, E. (2021). The role of
innovation on start-up failure vs. its success. International Journal
of Business Ethics and Governance, 41-72. Amiri, A. M., Kushwaha, B. P., & Singh, R. (2023). Visualisation
of global research trends and future research directions of digital marketing
in small and medium enterprises using bibliometric analysis. Journal
of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30(3), 621-641. Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2010). Managing innovation
paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long
Range Planning, 43(1), 104-122. Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Balancing
exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive
intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58(12),
1652-1661. Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in
new product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(4),
61-83. Benitez, J., Castillo, A., Llorens,
J., & Braojos, J. (2018). IT-enabled knowledge
ambidexterity and innovation performance in small US firms: The moderator
role of social media capability. Information & Management, 55(1),
131-143. Björkdahl, J. (2020). Strategies for digitalization in manufacturing
firms. California Management Review, 62(4), 17-36. Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., &
Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions,
contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4),
781-796. Caputo, F., Fiano, F., Riso, T., Romano, M., & Maalaoui,
A. (2022). Digital platforms and international performance of Italian SMEs:
an exploitation-based overview. International Marketing Review, 39(3),
568-585. Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2019). Digital
marketing. Pearson UK. Chumphong, O., Srimai,
S., & Potipiroon, W. (2020). The resource-based
view, dynamic capabilities and SME performance for SMEs to become smart
enterprises. ABAC ODI Journal Vision. Action. Outcome,
7(2), 129. Chutiwong, N., & Kertsri, N. (2011). Analysis of
factors supporting an innovative organization in Thailand. Thammasat
Business Journal, 34(130), 47-58. Civelek, M., Gajdka, K., Svetlík,
J., & Vavrečka, V. (2020). Differences in the
usage of online marketing and social media tools: evidence from Czech,
Slovakian and Hungarian SMEs. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of
Economics and Economic Policy, 15(3), 537-563. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational
innovation: A meta-analysis of
effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of
Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P.
(2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A
sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy
and the Environment, 26(4), 490-506. Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm
competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12),
1095-1121. Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities
gap. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 183-195. De Souza Bermejo, P. H., Tonelli, A. O., Galliers, R. D., Oliveira, T., & Zambalde,
A. L. (2016). Conceptualizing organizational innovation: The case of the
Brazilian software industry. Information & Management, 53(4),
493-503. Drucker, P. F. (1985). The
Discipline of Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 67-72. Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout
the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy
of Management Review, 25(1), 154-177. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981).
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and
measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1),
39-50. Ghanizadeh, S., Ardabili, F. S., Kheirandish, M., Rasouli, E.,
& Hassanzadeh, M. (2022). Psychological capital
and organizational performance: the mediating role of organizational
ambidexterity. Organizacija, 55(3),
214-227. Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and
mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management
Journal, 47(2), 209-226. Gimenez-Fernandez, E. M., Sandulli,
F. D., & Bogers, M. (2020). Unpacking liabilities
of newness and smallness in innovative start-ups: Investigating the
differences in innovation performance between new and older small
firms. Research Policy, 49(10), 104049. Güttel, W. H., & Konlechner, S. W. (2009).
Continuously hanging by a thread: Managing contextually ambidextrous
organizations. Schmalenbach Business
Review, 61, 150-172. Hair,
J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson,
R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective
(7thed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice-Hall. Hair,
J. F., Sarstedt,
M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An
emerging tool in business research. European Business
Review, 26(2), 106–121. He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs.
exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization
Science, 15(4), 481-494. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant
validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of
the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. Inthasang, C., Khotsombat, S., & Ketchompu, D. (2021). Influence of digital marketing on
firm performance of hotel businesses in Thailand. Journal of Humanities
and Social Sciences Nakhon Phanom University, 110(3),
83-98. Jansen, J. J., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and
organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational
leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5),
982-1007. Johannessen, J. A., Olsen, B., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2001).
Innovation as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom? European
Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 20-31. Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V. A. S., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and
performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4),
299-312. Jurksiene, L., & Pundziene, A. (2016). The
relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: The
mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. European Business
Review, 28(4), 431-448. Kabongo, J. D., & Boiral, O. (2017). Doing more with less: Building dynamic
capabilities for eco-efficiency. Business Strategy and the
Environment, 26(7), 956-971. Kannan,
P. K. (2017). Digital marketing: A framework, review and research
agenda. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1),
22-45. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002).
Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new
product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6),
1183-1194. Kaur,
S., Gupta, S., Singh, S. K., & Perano, M.
(2019). Organizational ambidexterity through global strategic partnerships: A
cognitive computing perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social
Change, 145(1), 43-54. Kemp,
S. (2023). Digital 2023: Thailand. Retrieved March 26, 2024, from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-thailand Kim,
C., Song, J., & Nerkar, A. (2012). Learning and
innovation: Exploitation and exploration trade-offs. Journal of
Business Research, 65(8), 1189-1194. Kleis, L., Chwelos, P., Ramirez, R. V., & Cockburn, I. (2012).
Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on
innovation productivity. Information Systems Research, 23(1),
42-59. Kraus,
S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A.
(2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An
overview of the current status quo. International Journal of
Information Management, 63(1), 1-18. Kraus,
S., Roig-Tierno, N., & Bouncken,
R. B. (2019). Digital innovation and venturing: An introduction into the
digitalization of entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 13(3),
519-528. Lertpiromsuk, S., Ueasangkomsate, P., Laohavichien,
T., & Wanarat, S. (2024). The relationship
between human resource management and innovativeness of small and medium
enterprises: The mediating and moderating role of innovative organizational
culture. Journal of Business Administration, 47(1), 1-27. Levinthal,
D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic
Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112. Liu,
Q. R., Liu, J. M., & He, Z. P. (2023). Digital transformation
ambidexterity and business performance. Journal of Enterprise
Information Management, 36(5), 1402-1420. Madhavan, R., & Grover,
R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product
development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing, 62(4),
1-12. Malesev, S., & Cherry,
M. (2021). Digital and social media marketing-growing market share for
construction SMEs. Construction Economics and Building, 21(1),
65-82. March,
J. G. (1991). Exploration
and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization
Science 2(1), 71–87. Matysiak, L., Rugman, A.
M., & Bausch, A. (2018). Dynamic capabilities of multinational
enterprises: The dominant logics behind sensing, seizing, and transforming
matter. Management International Review, 58(1),
225-250. Mumi, A. (2020).
Effectual entrepreneur and the use of social media for opportunity
recognition. Understanding Social Media and Entrepreneurship: The
Business of Hashtags, Likes, Tweets and Stories, 49-67. National
Innovation Agency (2021). Thailand
Startup Ecosystem Report 2021. Retrieved March 26,
2024, from https://www.nia.or.th/frontend/article/skhonvse/editor/files/THAILAND-STARTUP-ECOSYSTEM-REPORT-2021.pdf Ngammoh, N., Mumi, A., Popaitoon, S., & Issarapaibool, A. (2023). Enabling social media as a
strategic capability for SMEs through organizational ambidexterity. Journal
of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 35(2), 197-217. Oke, A., Walumbwa, F.
O., & Myers, A. (2012). Innovation strategy, human resource policy, and
firms' revenue growth: The roles of environmental uncertainty and innovation
performance. Decision Sciences, 43(2), 273-302. O'Reilly
III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008).
Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's
dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(1),
185-206. O'Reilly
III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011).
Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California
Management Review, 53(4), 5-22. O'Reilly
III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013).
Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of
Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. Pakura, S., & Rudeloff, C. (2023). How entrepreneurs build brands and
reputation with social media PR: empirical insights from start-ups in
Germany. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 35(2),
153-180. Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman,
M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and
exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4),
685-695. Rothaermel,
F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in
biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management
Journal, 25(3), 201-221. Rovinelli, R.
J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the
assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Tijdschrift
voor Onderwijsresearch, 2(2),
49-60. Schumpeter,
J. A. (1934). Theory of economic
development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the
business cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Shahzad,
M., Qu, Y., Rehman, S. U., & Zafar, A. U. (2022). Adoption of green
innovation technology to accelerate sustainable development among
manufacturing industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4),
1-12. Simsek, Z. (2009).
Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal
of Management Studies, 46(4), 597-624. Solís-Molina,
M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez-Orejuela, A. (2018). Performance implications of
organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or
exploration: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business
Research, 91(1), 181-194. Srisaard, B. (2017).
Preliminary research (10th ed.). Bangkok: Suwiriyasarn. Startup Thailand. (2024). Startup
Thailand Ecosystem, Exploring the world of
startup. Retrieved March 26, 2024, from https://ecosystem.startupthailand.org/ Subramaniam,
M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of
intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy
of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463. Sulistiyani, E., Azizah, A., Nurkhayati, I.,
& Saad, M. S. M. (2023). The role of digital marketing and ambidexterity
integrated solution in improving MSME business performance. International
Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research, 2(3),
250-263. Tanskanen, K., Holmström, J., & Öhman, M.
(2015). Generative mechanisms of the adoption of logistics innovation: the
case of on‐site shops in construction supply chains. Journal of
Business Logistics, 36(2), 139-159. Tariq,
E., Alshurideh, M., Akour,
I., & Al-Hawary, S. (2022). The effect of
digital marketing capabilities on organizational ambidexterity of the information
technology sector. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(2),
401-408. Teece,
D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial
action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8),
1395-1401. Teece,
D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic
capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7),
509-533. Turner,
N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms
for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International
Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317-332. Úbeda-García, M., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara,
B., & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. (2017). Human resource
flexibility and performance in the hotel industry: The role of organizational
ambidexterity. Personnel Review, 46(4), 824-846. Uppapong, K., Photchanacha, S., & Tammayattiwong
S. (2022). Influence of digital marketing communication
Tools in the creation for customer satisfaction. NIDA Business Journal,
30, 42-68. Vera, D., & Crossan, M.
(2004). Theatrical improvisation: Lessons for organizations. Organization
Studies, 25(5), 727-749. Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous
organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation:
A comparative study of UK and Chinese high-tech firms. British
Journal of Management, 25(1), 58-76. Wongpun, S., Cuijten, N., Inmor,
S., Suwannahong, R., & Buaprommee,
N. (2024). Design and develop an online digital marketing course to enhance
Thai manufacturing MSME’s digital marketing capabilities. Journal of
Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8), 1-27. Yasmin, A., Tasneem, S., & Fatema,
K. (2015). Effectiveness of digital marketing in the challenging age: An
empirical study. International Journal of Management Science and
Business Administration, 1(5), 69-80. Zehir, C., Can, E., & Karaboga, T. (2015).
Linking entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the role of
differentiation strategy and innovation performance. Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 210(1), 358-367. Zhang, J. A., Edgar, F., Geare,
A., & O'Kane, C. (2016). The interactive effects of entrepreneurial
orientation and capability-based HRM on firm performance: The mediating role
of innovation ambidexterity. Industrial Marketing Management, 59(1),
131-143. Zhou, L., Xu, S. R., Xu, H., &
Barnes, B. R. (2020). Unleashing the dynamics of product-market ambidexterity
in the pursuit of international opportunities: Insights from emerging market
firms. International Business Review, 29(6), 101614. |
||