¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ·ÕèÁռŵèÍ¡ÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ : º·ºÒ·¢Í§µÑÇá»Ã¤Ñ蹡ÅÒ§ ¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡ÃÃкº¹ÔàÇÈʵÒÃì·ÍѾ㹻ÃÐà·Èä·Â

 

Digital Marketing on Innovation Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity in Thailand’s Startup Ecosystem

 

 

Çѹ·Õèä´éÃѺµé¹©ºÑºº·¤ÇÒÁ :
8 µØÅÒ¤Á 2567

Çѹ·Õèá¡é䢻ÃѺ»Ãاº·¤ÇÒÁ :
27 ¾ÄȨԡÒ¹ 2567

Çѹ·ÕèµÍºÃѺµÕ¾ÔÁ¾ìº·¤ÇÒÁ :
17 ¸Ñ¹ÇÒ¤Á 2567

´Ã.¾§Éì¹ÃÔ¹·Ãì »Ô´¨ÑµØÃÑÊ

´Ã.©ÑµÃªÑ ÍÔ¹·Êѧ¢ì

¼ÙéªèÇÂÈÒʵÃÒ¨ÒÃÂì»ÃШÓÊÒ¢Ò¡ÒõÅÒ´

¤³ÐºÃÔËÒøØÃ¡Ô¨ ÁËÒÇÔ·ÂÒÅÑÂà·¤â¹âÅÂÕÃÒªÁ§¤ÅÍÕÊÒ¹

´Ã.¹ÔÃÁÒÅÂì §ÒÁàËÁÒÐ

ÍÒ¨ÒÃÂì»ÃШÓÊÒ¢Ò¡ÒèѴ¡ÒÃ

¤³Ðà·¤â¹âÅÂÕ¡ÒèѴ¡Òà ÁËÒÇÔ·ÂÒÅÑÂà·¤â¹âÅÂÕÃÒªÁ§¤ÅÍÕÊÒ¹ ÇÔ·ÂÒà¢µÊØÃÔ¹·Ãì

(¼Ùé»ÃÐÊÒ¹§Ò¹ËÅÑ¡)

 

 

Received:
October 8, 2024

Revised:
November 27, 2024

Accepted:
December 17, 2024

 

Dr.Pongnarin Pitjatturat

Dr.Chatchai Inthasang

Assistant professor of Marketing Program,

Faculty Business Administration,

Rajamangala University of Technology Isan

Dr.Niramarn Ngammoh

Lecturer of Management Program,

Faculty of Management Technology,

Rajamangala University of Technology Isan Surin Campus

(Corresponding Author)

 

 

¤ÓÊӤѭ :

¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ ¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁè
áÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ ¡ÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹
´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ ͧ¤ì¡ÃÃкº¹ÔàÇÈ
ʵÒÃì·ÍѾ

º·¤Ñ´ÂèÍ

¡ÒÃÇԨѹÕéÁÕÇѵ¶Ø»ÃÐʧ¤ì à¾×è͵ÃǨÊͺ¤ÇÒÁÊÍ´¤Åéͧ¡ÅÁ¡Å×¹âÁà´ÅÊÁ¡ÒÃâ¤Ã§ÊÃéÒ§¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ·ÕèÁÕÍÔ·¸Ô¾ÅµèÍ¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁáÅСÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡ÃÃкº¹ÔàÇÈʵÒÃì·ÍѾ㹻ÃÐà·Èä·Â áÅÐà¾×èÍÈÖ¡ÉÒº·ºÒ·µÑÇá»Ã¤Ñ蹡ÅÒ§¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡ÃÃÐËÇèÒ§¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅáÅСÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡ÃÃкº¹ÔàÇÈʵÒÃì·ÍѾ㹻ÃÐà·Èä·Â â´Â»ÃЪҡÃ㹡ÒÃÇԨѤÃÑé§¹Õé¤×Í Í§¤ì¡ÃÃкº¹ÔàÇÈʵÒÃì·ÍѾ㹻ÃÐà·Èä·Â ãªéẺÊͺ¶ÒÁà»ç¹à¤Ã×èͧÁ×Í㹡ÒÃà¡çºÃǺÃÇÁ¢éÍÁÙÅ ¨Ò¡¨Ó¹Ç¹»ÃЪҡ÷Ñé§ËÁ´ 488 ͧ¤ì¡Ã ä´é¨Ó¹Ç¹¡ÅØèÁµÑÇÍÂèÒ§¡ÅѺÁÒ 242 ͧ¤ì¡Ã ÇÔà¤ÃÒÐËì¢éÍÁÙÅ´éÇÂâÁà´ÅÊÁ¡ÒÃâ¤Ã§ÊÃéÒ§ ¼Å¡ÒÃÇԨѾºÇèÒ ¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅÁÕÍÔ·¸Ô¾ÅàªÔ§ºÇ¡ÍÂèÒ§ÁÕ¹ÑÂÊӤѭµèÍ¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡Ã ¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡ÃÁÕÍÔ·¸Ô¾ÅàªÔ§ºÇ¡ÍÂèÒ§ÁÕ¹ÑÂÊӤѭµèÍ¡ÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ áÅСÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁä´éÃѺÍÔ·¸Ô¾Å·Ò§ÍéÍÁã¹àªÔ§ºÇ¡¨Ò¡¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ â´Â¼èÒ¹µÑÇá»Ã¤Ñ蹡ÅÒ§¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡Ã â´Â¼Å¡ÒÃÇԨѤÃÑé§¹Õé ÊÒÁÒö¹Óä»ÊÙèͧ¤ì¤ÇÒÁÃÙéà¡ÕèÂǡѺ¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ ¡ÒÃÁØè§à¹é¹·Ñé§ÊÔè§ãËÁèáÅÐÊÔè§·ÕèÁÕÍÂÙèà´ÔÁ¢Í§Í§¤ì¡Ã áÅСÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ ¹Í¡¨Ò¡¹Õé º·¤ÇÒÁ¹ÕéÂѧÁդس¤èÒÍÂèÒ§ÂÔè§ÊÓËÃѺ¹Ñ¡ÇÔ¨ÑÂáÅмÙéºÃÔËÒÃͧ¤ì¡Ã ÃÇÁ¶Ö§Ë¹èǧҹ·Õèà¡ÕèÂÇ¢éͧ¡ÑºÍ§¤ì¡ÃÃкº¹ÔàÇÈʵÒÃì·ÍѾ㹻ÃÐà·Èä·Â à¾×èÍãªéà»ç¹á¹Ç·Ò§ã¹¡ÒáÓ˹´¡ÅÂØ·¸ì´éÒ¹¡ÒõÅÒ´´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅáÅСÒôÓà¹Ô¹§Ò¹´éÒ¹¹Çѵ¡ÃÃÁ·ÕèÊÙ§¢Öé¹

 

 

Keywords:
Digital Marketing, Organizational
Ambidexterity, Innovation Performance,
Startup Ecosystem

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to empirically examine the structural equation model of the influence of digital marketing on organizational ambidexterity and innovation performance of Thailand startup ecosystems.  The study investigated the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity in the relationship between digital marketing and innovation. A survey was administered to a sample of 242 Thai startup organizations, selected from a population of 488. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze the data. The findings revealed that digital marketing significantly and positively influenced organizational ambidexterity. Organizational ambidexterity was found to have a significant positive impact on innovation performance. Furthermore, digital marketing indirectly influenced innovation performance through the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. The findings of this research contribute to knowledge on digital marketing, organizational ambidexterity, and innovation performance. In addition, this article offers significant value to researchers, organizational leaders, and entities involved in the startup ecosystem in Thailand. It serves as a guide for developing advanced strategies in digital marketing and innovation performance.

 

 

 

REFERENCES

Aaker, J. L., Benet-Martinez, V., & Garolera, J. (2001). Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constuctsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology81(3), 492-508.

Abetti, P. A. (2000). Critical success factors for radical technological innovation: A five case study. Creativity and Innovation Management9(4), 208-221.

ABI, J., & Arief, M. T. S. (2017). Examining the relationship between transformational leadership and dynamic capability to the adoption of digital marketing in consumer shopping good firms. International Journal of Economics & Management11(S2), 487-504.

Al Nuaimi, F. M. S., Singh, S. K., & Ahmad, S. Z. (2024). Open innovation in SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management28(2), 484-504.

Ali Abbasi, G., Abdul Rahim, N. F., Wu, H., Iranmanesh, M., & Keong, B. N. C. (2022). Determinants of SME’s social media marketing adoption: competitive industry as a moderator. Sage Open12(1), 1-19.

Aminova, M., & Marchi, E. (2021). The role of innovation on start-up failure vs. its success. International Journal of Business Ethics and Governance, 41-72.

Amiri, A. M., Kushwaha, B. P., & Singh, R. (2023). Visualisation of global research trends and future research directions of digital marketing in small and medium enterprises using bibliometric analysis. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development30(3), 621-641.

Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2010). Managing innovation paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Planning43(1), 104-122.

Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research58(12), 1652-1661.

Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005). Resolving the capability–rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of Marketing69(4), 61-83.

Benitez, J., Castillo, A., Llorens, J., & Braojos, J. (2018). IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small US firms: The moderator role of social media capability. Information & Management55(1), 131-143.

Björkdahl, J. (2020). Strategies for digitalization in manufacturing firms. California Management Review62(4), 17-36.

Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science20(4), 781-796.

Caputo, F., Fiano, F., Riso, T., Romano, M., & Maalaoui, A. (2022). Digital platforms and international performance of Italian SMEs: an exploitation-based overview. International Marketing Review39(3), 568-585.

Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2019). Digital marketing. Pearson UK.

Chumphong, O., Srimai, S., & Potipiroon, W. (2020). The resource-based view, dynamic capabilities and SME performance for SMEs to become smart enterprises. ABAC ODI Journal Vision. Action. Outcome, 7(2), 129.

Chutiwong, N., & Kertsri, N. (2011). Analysis of factors supporting an innovative organization in Thailand. Thammasat Business Journal, 34(130), 47-58.

Civelek, M., Gajdka, K., Svetlík, J., & Vavrečka, V. (2020). Differences in the usage of online marketing and social media tools: evidence from Czech, Slovakian and Hungarian SMEs. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy15(3), 537-563.

Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.

Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490-506.

Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal23(12), 1095-1121.

Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities gap. Journal of Marketing75(4), 183-195.

De Souza Bermejo, P. H., Tonelli, A. O., Galliers, R. D., Oliveira, T., & Zambalde, A. L. (2016). Conceptualizing organizational innovation: The case of the Brazilian software industry. Information & Management53(4), 493-503.

Drucker, P. F. (1985). The Discipline of Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 68(4), 67-72.

Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review25(1), 154-177.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1), 39-50.

Ghanizadeh, S., Ardabili, F. S., Kheirandish, M., Rasouli, E., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2022). Psychological capital and organizational performance: the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Organizacija55(3), 214-227.

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal47(2), 209-226.

Gimenez-Fernandez, E. M., Sandulli, F. D., & Bogers, M. (2020). Unpacking liabilities of newness and smallness in innovative start-ups: Investigating the differences in innovation performance between new and older small firms. Research Policy49(10), 104049.

Güttel, W. H., & Konlechner, S. W. (2009). Continuously hanging by a thread: Managing contextually ambidextrous organizations. Schmalenbach Business Review, 61, 150-172.

Hair, J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7thed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106121.

He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science15(4), 481-494.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43(1), 115-135.

Inthasang, C., Khotsombat, S., & Ketchompu, D. (2021). Influence of digital marketing on firm performance of hotel businesses in Thailand. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Nakhon Phanom University, 110(3), 83-98.

Jansen, J. J., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies45(5), 982-1007.

Johannessen, J. A., Olsen, B., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2001). Innovation as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management4(1), 20-31.

Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V. A. S., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives27(4), 299-312.

Jurksiene, L., & Pundziene, A. (2016). The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. European Business Review28(4), 431-448.

Kabongo, J. D., & Boiral, O. (2017). Doing more with less: Building dynamic capabilities for eco-efficiency. Business Strategy and the Environment26(7), 956-971.

Kannan, P. K. (2017). Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda. International Journal of Research in Marketing34(1), 22-45.

Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal45(6), 1183-1194.

Kaur, S., Gupta, S., Singh, S. K., & Perano, M. (2019). Organizational ambidexterity through global strategic partnerships: A cognitive computing perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change145(1), 43-54.

Kemp, S. (2023). Digital 2023: Thailand. Retrieved March 26, 2024, from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-thailand

Kim, C., Song, J., & Nerkar, A. (2012). Learning and innovation: Exploitation and exploration trade-offs. Journal of Business Research65(8), 1189-1194.

Kleis, L., Chwelos, P., Ramirez, R. V., & Cockburn, I. (2012). Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Information Systems Research23(1), 42-59.

Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management63(1), 1-18.

Kraus, S., Roig-Tierno, N., & Bouncken, R. B. (2019). Digital innovation and venturing: An introduction into the digitalization of entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science13(3), 519-528.

Lertpiromsuk, S., Ueasangkomsate, P., Laohavichien, T., & Wanarat, S. (2024). The relationship between human resource management and innovativeness of small and medium enterprises: The mediating and moderating role of innovative organizational culture. Journal of Business Administration, 47(1), 1-27.

Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112.

Liu, Q. R., Liu, J. M., & He, Z. P. (2023). Digital transformation ambidexterity and business performance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management36(5), 1402-1420.

Madhavan, R., & Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing62(4), 1-12.

Malesev, S., & Cherry, M. (2021). Digital and social media marketing-growing market share for construction SMEs. Construction Economics and Building21(1), 65-82.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science 2(1), 7187.

Matysiak, L., Rugman, A. M., & Bausch, A. (2018). Dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises: The dominant logics behind sensing, seizing, and transforming matter. Management International Review58(1), 225-250.

Mumi, A. (2020). Effectual entrepreneur and the use of social media for opportunity recognition. Understanding Social Media and Entrepreneurship: The Business of Hashtags, Likes, Tweets and Stories, 49-67.

National Innovation Agency (2021). Thailand Startup Ecosystem Report 2021. Retrieved March 26, 2024, from https://www.nia.or.th/frontend/article/skhonvse/editor/files/THAILAND-STARTUP-ECOSYSTEM-REPORT-2021.pdf

Ngammoh, N., Mumi, A., Popaitoon, S., & Issarapaibool, A. (2023). Enabling social media as a strategic capability for SMEs through organizational ambidexterity. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship35(2), 197-217.

Oke, A., Walumbwa, F. O., & Myers, A. (2012). Innovation strategy, human resource policy, and firms' revenue growth: The roles of environmental uncertainty and innovation performance. Decision Sciences43(2), 273-302.

O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior28(1), 185-206.

O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review53(4), 5-22.

O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives27(4), 324-338.

Pakura, S., & Rudeloff, C. (2023). How entrepreneurs build brands and reputation with social media PR: empirical insights from start-ups in Germany. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship35(2), 153-180.

Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science20(4), 685-695.

Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal25(3), 201-221.

Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 2(2), 49-60.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). Theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Rehman, S. U., & Zafar, A. U. (2022). Adoption of green innovation technology to accelerate sustainable development among manufacturing industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge7(4), 1-12.

Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies46(4), 597-624.

Solís-Molina, M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez-Orejuela, A. (2018). Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research91(1), 181-194.

Srisaard, B. (2017). Preliminary research (10th ed.). Bangkok: Suwiriyasarn.

Startup Thailand. (2024). Startup Thailand Ecosystem, Exploring the world of startup. Retrieved March 26, 2024, from https://ecosystem.startupthailand.org/

Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal48(3), 450-463.

Sulistiyani, E., Azizah, A., Nurkhayati, I., & Saad, M. S. M. (2023). The role of digital marketing and ambidexterity integrated solution in improving MSME business performance. International Journal of Economics, Business and Innovation Research2(3), 250-263.

Tanskanen, K., Holmström, J., & Öhman, M. (2015). Generative mechanisms of the adoption of logistics innovation: the case of on‐site shops in construction supply chains. Journal of Business Logistics36(2), 139-159.

Tariq, E., Alshurideh, M., Akour, I., & Al-Hawary, S. (2022). The effect of digital marketing capabilities on organizational ambidexterity of the information technology sector. International Journal of Data and Network Science6(2), 401-408.

Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies49(8), 1395-1401.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal18(7), 509-533.

Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews15(3), 317-332.

Úbeda-García, M., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Zaragoza-Sáez, P. (2017). Human resource flexibility and performance in the hotel industry: The role of organizational ambidexterity. Personnel Review46(4), 824-846.

Uppapong, K., Photchanacha, S., & Tammayattiwong S. (2022). Influence of digital marketing communication Tools in the creation for customer satisfaction. NIDA Business Journal, 30, 42-68.

Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Theatrical improvisation: Lessons for organizations. Organization Studies25(5), 727-749.

Wang, C. L., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation: A comparative study of UK and Chinese high-tech firms. British Journal of Management25(1), 58-76.

Wongpun, S., Cuijten, N., Inmor, S., Suwannahong, R., & Buaprommee, N. (2024). Design and develop an online digital marketing course to enhance Thai manufacturing MSME’s digital marketing capabilities. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development8(8), 1-27.

Yasmin, A., Tasneem, S., & Fatema, K. (2015). Effectiveness of digital marketing in the challenging age: An empirical study. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration1(5), 69-80.

Zehir, C., Can, E., & Karaboga, T. (2015). Linking entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the role of differentiation strategy and innovation performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences210(1), 358-367.

Zhang, J. A., Edgar, F., Geare, A., & O'Kane, C. (2016). The interactive effects of entrepreneurial orientation and capability-based HRM on firm performance: The mediating role of innovation ambidexterity. Industrial Marketing Management59(1), 131-143.

Zhou, L., Xu, S. R., Xu, H., & Barnes, B. R. (2020). Unleashing the dynamics of product-market ambidexterity in the pursuit of international opportunities: Insights from emerging market firms. International Business Review29(6), 101614.